Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 5641 - 5660 of 9,057
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm by Scott David Stewart
Now, our Arizona Supreme Court in Phoenix is taking a very close look at the role of wireless technology in all court procedures, civil and criminal. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky In major Supreme Court cases, it’s useful to have a scorecard. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:43 am by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court, which will issue a decision by the end of its 2011-2012 term. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am by Kent Scheidegger
The only mention of the legality of possession in the opinion is dictum in a footnote referencing an entirely separate chapter of title 21 of the United States Code, not at issue in the litigation.Third, the order clearly crosses the line drawn by the controlling Supreme Court precedent in Heckler v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Irene
Supreme Court has disagreed with that absurd assessment. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court case over Arizona's latest anti-immigration law, scheduled for a hearing next week, hinges largely on the question of where states' power over immigration ends and federal power begins. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Gifford (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) has posted The Constitutional Bounding of Adjudication: A Fuller(ian) Explanation for the Supreme Court's Mass Tort Jurisprudence (Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 10:02 am by Michelle Yeary
  The Supreme Court reasoned that where a claim – such as fraud-on-the-FDA – is not based on a state law cause of action, but rather “exist[s] solely by virtue of the FDCA disclosure requirements,” Buckman, 531 U.S. at 352-53, it is preempted. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
Here are a few photos from Tuesday’s hearing at the Supreme Court regarding the ethics charges against three lawyers: Andrew Thomas, Lisa Aubuchon and Rachel Alexander. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:27 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, April 13, 2012: Edwards Case Puts Definition of ‘Contribution’ on Trial A Judge’s Crusade against Saggy Pants Goldman Sachs paying $22 million to settle SEC charges The Sexual Sadism of the Michigan Department of Correctionsy from @firedoglake California Employers Must Provide Meal Breaks, Court Says Oshawa Justice of the Peace suspended for sexually harassing female court… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:46 pm by nflatow
The importance of civil rights in legal debates over immigration policy is evident in the current conversation about Arizona’s Senate Bill (S.B.) 1070, and the related Supreme Court case: Arizona v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:42 am by Steve Hall
  Earlier coverage of these Arizona and Ohio cases begins at the link. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:30 am by azatty
Rebecca Berch, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Arizona        Hon. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 5:11 pm by Ronda Muir
 The South Carolina Supreme Court held that a sexual relationship with a current client 's spouse is a per se violation of the conflict-of-interest Rule 1.7  "as it creates the significant risk that the representation of the client will be limited by the personal interests of the attorney. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:55 am by azatty
Thomas, Aubuchon and Alexander have 10 days to decide whether they will appeal the rulings to the Arizona Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am by Charles Johnson
Scarpelli (411 U.S. 778), the Supreme Court decided that where “liberty interests” are involved, probationers are entitled to retain certain due process rights. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:46 am by admin
Yesterday, a three-person Hearing Panel appointed at the direction of the Supreme Court of Arizona ordered former Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas disbarred. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:27 am by Matt Brown
He’ll probably continue fighting with an appeal to the Supreme Court of Arizona. [read post]