Search for: "BROWN v. BROWN" Results 5641 - 5660 of 14,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 4:06 pm
 Here is Brown's initial brief; here is the state's initial brief; here is Brown's second brief (reply brief on his appeal, and appellee's brief with respect to the state's appeal). [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 10:01 am by Daniel Jin
“The default position now in all jurisdictions must be that hearings should be conducted with one, more than one or all participants attending remotely”: Message to the Judges in the Civil and Family Courts, Lord Burnett of Maldon (19 March 2020) “It remains the obligation of all involved and at all stages of the hearing, to continue to evaluate whether fairness to all the parties is being achieved. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
 Justice Heeney concluded that the biosolid application did not contaminate the Plaintiff's well.Read the decision at: Marshall v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am by Legal Talk Network
  This led to the use of as robot, the Remotec Androx Mark V A-1, manufactured by Northrup Grumman and a pound of C-4 explosive, which was sent in eventually killing the sniper. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 2:35 pm by Joe Patrice
I wonder if Todd Graham will slimily bail on another school and join his old boss at Texas when Mack Brown is unceremoniously fired. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:00 am
STUDENTS WERE NEEDLESSLY ARRESTED OR SENT TO MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIESIn early March, the United States Department of Justice announced that it had reached a settlement with Florida’s Pasco County School District resolving an investigation into alleged discrimination of students with disabilities.When it came to school discipline, the school district would “routinely” suspend mentally ill students or have them arrested rather than attempt to secure “proper support” or to… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:21 pm by Lev Sugarman
Peter Margulies examined the Supreme Court decision in Nielsen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
In the 1950s, her legal scholarship helped Thurgood Marshall challenge segregation head-on in the landmark Brown v. [read post]