Search for: "Caming v. United States"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 9,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2014, 6:26 am
The court thus granted in part the government’s motion to dismiss (Martin v The United States, July 31, 2014, Campbell-Smith, P). [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
All of that came to an abrupt halt following a nationwide injunction issued in Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two major projects of legal feminism in the United States—women’s suffrage as achieved by the Nineteenth Amendment—and equal protection of the laws without sex discrimination as achieved by Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1970s litigation strategy—tried to end legal patriarchy. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:29 pm
And, in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
The least surprising line-up of the day came in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
A number of years later, a similar case came before Costello J. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
S. 312, 327 (1986) (same); United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Thus, whatever effect ordinary murders, or robbery, or gun possession might have on interstate commerce (or on any other subject of federal concern) was irrelevant to the question of congressional power....and...United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
[16] Moreover, unlike the theory prevalent in the United States today, the Romans were not concerned with writing down laws for the masses to read for themselves. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Rees v United Kingdom, para 49; Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom, para 66; see also Cossey v United Kingdom, paras 43, 46; I v United Kingdom (GC), para 78; Jaremowicz v Poland, para 48 ('right of a man and a woman to marry')) The historical analysis of the original intent behind Article 12 doesn't help. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:14 pm
“[I]n such case it is the law of [the state where the mortal blow is given] that is violated, and not the law of the state where death may happen to occur” (Stout v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
That’s not much of an overstatement; the passage of the amendment came after 41 years diplomatic, political, and legal battles. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
An “Officer of the United States” is, according to the Supreme Court, “any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
Guest Post: DABUS Gains Traction: South Africa Becomes First Country to Recognize AI-Invented Patent
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm
Notably, their application has been denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), and the European Patent Office (EPO). [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:56 pm
A few weeks ago I shocked the world -- okay, surprised a few people -- by pointing out United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:25 am
See Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:44 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
