Search for: "Case Worker"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 72,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2020, 1:28 pm
Speak With a Workers Comp AttorneyGive us a call 24/7 for a FREE Case EvaluationCall (314) 361-4300 [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 3:14 pm
In a recent case, the employee allegedly hurt himself at work when he slipped and fell. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:44 pm
Recently, a Massachusetts court discussed whether claims for emotional distress are barred by the exclusivity provision in a case in which the plaintiff sought damages from her coworkers. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:42 am
This means that every single day, 13 families lost a mother, father, spouse, or child in an accident that could – and in many cases should – have been prevented. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
That’s why this case is one that states beyond California’s borders are watching closely. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc vs. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:15 am
More than the usual troubling CA notice cases, that is. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Additional Options for Injured Employees Filing a workers’ compensation claim is your sole remedy in most cases of work-related medical conditions, including injuries caused by workplace violence. [read post]
Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation May Provide Coverage for Injuries Suffered at Holiday Work Events
26 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
” Case law involving workers’ compensation eligibility for injuries at holiday parties makes clear that the following factors can help determine whether a holiday party injury is compensable: Did the employer encourage or make attendance at the party or event mandatory? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:38 am
The case looked at whether it’s okay to pay workers a set rate per day, rather than an hourly rate. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
In many cases the Workers' Comp carrier is paid back from the settlement. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 12:12 pm
At least 430 audit cases listed as “closed” by the agency had high percentages of workers with “questionable” documents yet they faced no consequences. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:19 pm
(workersxzcompxzkit) "This case highlights the need for employers to be aware of what goes on during the night shift. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and DiseaseBNSF Railway Company v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:32 pm
Colvin (10th Cir., August 18) (affirming denial of disability benefits)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 5:58 pm
Berryhill (10th Cir., March 17, 2017) (reversing Commissioner denial of disability benefits because the ALJ failed to consider disorder severity and failed to order consultative examinations)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
., June 16, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the Union concluding that agreement requiring that certain positions be staffed with union workers is subject to arbitration provision)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:05 pm
Pritkzer (10th Cir., October 113, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Elhelbawy's numerous claims because she did not properly or adequately present evidence in support of her claims)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:28 pm
Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*RIVERA v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:11 am
Colvin (10th Cir., March 15, 2016) (affirming denial of social security benefits, because Bradley failed to raise his claims below, and his arguments focused on merely technical omissions)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
