Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 5641 - 5660 of 7,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 10:39 pm by Olya Gurevich
The ongoing project of restoring and preserving African art may should consider the words of Ousmane Sembene: “My future does not depend on Europe… Why be a sunflower and turn to the sun, I myself am the sun. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 11:06 am by Edward Smith
  This is where level I trauma centers can intervene. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Treasuring God’s love the way I treasure the priceless gift of you. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:53 pm by Michael C. Smith
  I'll admit that when I saw the verdict form, I was puzzled as to how it would translate into a judgment, but I assumed that it reflected something that had either happened at trial, or might happen in the postverdict JMOL rulings that wasn't apparent to those of us who weren't in the courtroom - and it turns out that it did. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:18 am by John Duffy
Brand X Internet Services, which authorizes agencies to use their rulemaking powers to overturn (in effect) judicial decisions. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 2:01 am by Melissa Blazejak, Editor
I have four Slack workspaces that I’m apart of, two different Google Hangout groups, two Microsoft Teams groups, Facebook Messenger, and LinkedIn messages … and they all sit in this one app. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I trust Google to make a good faith attempt to match what I’m asking for and find relevant websites. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:20 pm
Forgive me if what follows strikes you as simplistic (good for you if it does!) [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm by Michael Grossman
I have no doubt that many people in this country genuinely despise this child, which must surely cause him some concern, and I can also see how it’s all a bit unfair since he never asked for any of this. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:58 am
As one Sixth Circuit decision put it, “In essence, while [harassment law] does not require an employer to fire all ‘Archie Bunkers’ in its employ, the law does require that an employer take prompt action to prevent such bigots from expressing their opinions in a way that abuses or offends their co-workers. [read post]