Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 5641 - 5660 of 7,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 2:50 am
In the recent English Commercial Court decision of Ispat Industries Ltd v Western Bulk Ltd [2011] EWHC 93 (Comm), the court held that an appeal based on section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act) would only be successful under the most serious of circumstances and where there was or stood to be a risk of substantial injustice to one of the parties.The dispute surrounded a charter under a fixture recap which was cancelled due to an insurgency preventing access to the load… [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:04 am by Darius Whelan
(British Telecom & TalkTalk) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.In the Scarlet case, the Advocate General issued an opinion against a Belgian court order requiring an ISP to block and filter material which is in breach of copyright. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:14 pm
Sir Robin stated that this argument is listened to more by Continental judges than by English ones, which is worrying. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:45 pm
 A two-week English course doesn’t turn a foreigner into an English-speaking American. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V An accused person shall not be extradited, under the provisions of this Treaty, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause under the laws of the State asking extradition, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment on account of the punishable act for which extradition is asked. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:27 am
legalweek In the increasingly heated debate about the state of English privacy law, the courts have frequently been accused of seeking to introduce a privacy law 'by the back door'. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
A more detailed post will follow.* I had previously stated, erroneously, that the arbitration clause between the parties designated English law as the law governing the arbitration. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:52 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" Setting aside the abuse of the English language, however, I think I preferred our style of furlough. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am by INFORRM
In the increasingly heated debate about the state of English privacy law, the courts have frequently been accused of seeking to introduce a privacy law “by the backdoor”. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
Robert Lawson, Tim Marland p.99-108 # Sovereignty and the Chicago Convention: English Court of Appeal Rules on the Northern Cyprus Question Mark Franklin p.109-116 # Metal Neutrality and the Nation-Bound Airline Industry Paul V. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]