Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 5641 - 5660 of 37,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am by Amy Howe
When Wednesday’s oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Primary Stablecoin Risks The Report groups the risks related to stablecoins into three broad categories: (1) loss of value – risks to stablecoin users and stablecoin runs; (2) payment system risks; and (3) risks of scale – systemic risk and concentration of economic power. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:05 am by Tim Reed, FordHarrison
As discussed by the California Supreme Court in its 1995 opinion in Farmers Insurance Group v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Another was filed by attorney Dan Peterson, representing Law Enforcement Groups and State and Local Firearms Rights Groups (Law Enforcement Brief), while a third was filed by the Crime Prevention Research Center, led by John R. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Links to the business and human rights governance constellation Panellists include Professor Larry Catá Backer (Pennsylvania State University), Professor Dorothée Baumann-Pauly (University of Geneva), Dr David Birchall (London South Bank University), Dr Jernej Letnar Černič (Nova Univerza, Slovenia), Dr Sorcha McLeod (University of Copenhagen) and Dr Miho Taka (Coventry University). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Ellena Erskine
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:51 am by Mark Brnovich
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the upcoming argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
The shopping mall operator plaintiff prevailed on every significant issue, and the case failed to satisfy the Lanham Act’s requirement that a case be “exceptional” before fees could be awarded (Simon Property Group, L.P. v. [read post]
The shopping mall operator plaintiff prevailed on every significant issue, and the case failed to satisfy the Lanham Act’s requirement that a case be “exceptional” before fees could be awarded (Simon Property Group, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm by Amy Howe
An intermediate state appellate court upheld the regulation, concluding that it is a “neutral and generally applicable” rule that can survive under the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In particular, he didn't seem to grasp that by her reference to Sheldon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm by Amy Howe
The Department of Justice filed the second case, United States v. [read post]