Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 1:29 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
United States, a per curiam three-judge district court held that the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act violated the separation of powers because the statute had given the Comptroller General executive powers and Congress previously held the qualified power to remove the Comptroller for cause. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:42 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:35 am
In James v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm
§ 1514A; Lawson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's granting the Town of Cornwall's motion made pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint "for failure to state a cause of action". [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's granting the Town of Cornwall's motion made pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint "for failure to state a cause of action". [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division held that dismissal of Plaintiff's federal discrimination claims at the pleading stage "does not preclude Plaintiff's City and State Human Rights Laws claims based on principles of collateral estoppel. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division held that dismissal of Plaintiff's federal discrimination claims at the pleading stage "does not preclude Plaintiff's City and State Human Rights Laws claims based on principles of collateral estoppel. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:41 pm
Consumer protection got an unexpected boost this week when the United States Supreme announced its decision in Altria Group v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 2:25 pm
Reporting on yesterday's COA decision in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:11 am
Recently, the United States Supreme Court affirmed a 2010 ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a bankruptcy court, as a non-Article III court, did not have the constitutional authority to decide a state law claim brought by a debtor against a creditor, even though the matter was part of the “core” statutory jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments regarding the reach of prosecutorial immunity. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm
Circuit held that Congress’ TikTok ban survived a variety of Constitutional challenges, including a First Amendment challenge, even if strict scrutiny applies. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
Neither our Court nor the United States Supreme Court has held, and I would not now hold, that a two-way-television encounter is "face to face" in this sense. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
It also refused to hear related state claims.In Hunter v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
In Lines v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
JCN (2010) EWHC 843), it was held that a EU member state can decide not to exercise jurisdiction in a divorce "if it seems better overall for the case to be in another state". [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:19 pm
In United States v. [read post]
