Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 5641 - 5660
of 18,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 9:33 am
In which case, (points to posterioer) or (reaches into robe, honks breast) would be considered entirely (does that thing where you make a V you're your index and middle finger and lewdly stick your tongue through it...you know the one).Justice Stevens: I don't know what the fuck you people are talking about. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:19 am
For the purposes of copyright and defamation suits, they claim "We're not a media company--we're just a conduit. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:27 am
But if they do, that will bring us to Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:21 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the appeal in R. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:13 am
Mathena v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
Lastly, a day after the regular order list, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas issued a four-sentence statement respecting the petition for certiorari in Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:09 am
Readers with good memories may recall the decision of Mr Justice Warren (Patents Court, England and Wales) in Actavis v Novartis [2009] EWHC 41 (Ch) (noted briefly by the IPKat here) concerning the validity of Novartis's European patent EP0948320 which claimed a sustained release formulation for fluvastatin, a drug intended to prevent heart attacks caused by high cholesterol. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Question for the Justices. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
The most significant was In re Adoption of M.B. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:30 pm
Jesus Trilla-Pinero v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Lochner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
See Stewart Org., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Bell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
Justice Willett delivered the opinion of the Court.TDHHS v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
Looks like the NLRB is going to be very busy re-deciding those 500-plus cases. [read post]
