Search for: "In re Bush"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 6,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
But if Duke administrators are still badmouthing their students in the press now, they're idiots. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:02 pm
We asked them, and we’re asking everyone, to comment on the supplemental rules and include those scenarios for us to consider in drafting the final rules. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
If the consumer doesn’t think you’re trustworthy, you’re in deep trouble. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (The IP ADR Blog) (Techdirt) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (PLI) (PLI) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:51 pm
Bush – The NATO bloc broke up into blocking packages – Kommersant (April 7, 2008) “You don’t understand, George, that Ukraine is not even a state. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 5:37 pm
Because Senator McCain's approach was the same as the Bush Administration's: support ideological policies that made the crisis more likely; do nothing as the crisis hits; and then scramble as the whole thing collapses. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 12:21 pm
But you don't know what you're trying for. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:18 am
" The real meaning of my daydream was, "You're so guilty ab [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 10:22 am
We’re just doing this little bit. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
(NOTE TO THE READER: If that last sentence made any sense at all to you, please go back and re-read it.) [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
So even if the US were getting royally screwed on autos market access (which they're not), that's absolutely no reason for the President - who is supposed to represent all American workers, consumers and businesses (even the ones not owned by the US government!) [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:29 pm
Bush’s administration. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:00 am
"This is why we're the greatest country.... [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:13 am
Now change that up a bit–you’re a normal person doing an abnormal thing. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:53 am
Now, as we’re facing a crisis of unprecedented proportion, we’re learning the hard way that our rights as borrowers are almost non-existent. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
We’re very aware of that issue, since Bexis had a hand in winning it in In re BridgeStone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
Bush), and so they’re arguably the most hostile Circuit towards unions, employees and consumers. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 12:11 am
When President Bush signed the 2004 DoD Appropriations bill, on September 30, 2003 (just before Jack Goldsmith took over at OLC), he issued a signing statement that raised a constitutional objection to section 8131. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Bush and Barack Obama. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
The theme in San Jose was "Say it loud, We're disabled, and we're proud. [read post]
