Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 35,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 12:09 am
Facciponti works for the taxpayers of the United States of America. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 1:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
Under a Supreme Court case dating back to 1990, also arising in Mexico, the Fourth Amendment does not protect noncitizens located outside the United States, unless they have some pre-existing substantial, voluntary connection to the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:44 am
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office proposed changes to the rules of practice pertaining to the patent term adjustment provisions in view of the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Novartis AG v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
It largely adopts the reasoning of United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:00 am
Here's another one from the vault -- Sturges v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
Filed: June 6, 2012Opinion by Judge Albert J. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
On July 28, 2009, United States District Judge William G. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
The judge held that the "combination of drugs" method: "resulted in arbitrary abrogation of a statutory and substantive right of a condemned person, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution (due process clause)" See State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:23 pm
Mollett v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 6:01 pm
This year was one of the busiest in recent memory when it comes to cryptography law in the United States and around the world. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:58 am
The 21-page filing opens by stating that the decision rendered by the three-judge panel (Judges Janice Rogers Brown, David Tatel and Senior Judge A. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
The same provision of DOMA, of course, was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:20 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:04 am
United States v. [read post]
