Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 8,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2012, 1:16 pm
Peterson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The case is officially known as Florida v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
One says Martin was on the bottom fighting for his life, the other says it was Zimmerman who lay on the ground. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
It goes like this:"In Case C-461/10 Bonnier Audio AB v Perfect Communication Sweden AB the Högsta domstolen in Sweden referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling:"1. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:38 am
* "Teva Tigers v Astrazeneca Lions - obvious to sustain...? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 pm
As such, even recreational use outside of the workplace could have an effect on the workplace (Chaisson v Kellogg Brown & Root (Canada) Co (2008), 289 D.L.R. (4th) 95 (Kellogg Brown). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:53 am
Lai, 2007 BCSC 1023, para.134 and Kuskis). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:37 am
by Dennis Crouch Ergo Licensing v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
Recall the history of INS v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Here is the abstract:Harlan Fiske StoneJustice Harlan Fiske Stone's majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I don't see this having that kind of scope, a Roe v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:14 pm
Justice T.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:56 am
The second ground of challenge lay in the contention that the legislation was an irrational exercise of legislative authority, and thus unlawful at common law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:37 am
Here is the abstract: Justice Harlan Fiske Stone's majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
The Second Circuit has revived a racial discrimination claim against the Village of Southampton, ruling that the plaintiff survives summary judgment, in part, through his EEOC affidavit which lays out the facts needed to show that he was denied a promotion because he is white.The case is Broich v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am
In the ongoing struggle between Apple and Motorola over claims of patent infringement in just one of many battles that is taking place across the country over smart phones, both parties proposed claim constructions that were not particularly well-written for lay jurors. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:50 pm
The point of substance which lay behind this procedural battle was a difference between the parties as to whether an increment in the pollution load of less than 1% was or may be significant under the Habitats Directive, in circumstances where there were substantial existing pollutants. [read post]
