Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 5641 - 5660 of 5,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2007, 1:24 am
In fact, the subject matter of 74 JPTOS 315 has nothing to with the claims of US US 6,049,811. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
Dickson, J., concurs in result with separate opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 10:47 pm
Aeroquip-Vickers disagreed: in their view the combination was additional matter in the sense that it was a new inventive concept, neither disclosed not unambiguously derivable from the specification before its amendment.Pumfrey J refused the amendment and added that, if it were allowed, the claim would be invalid because it covered the alleged infringement. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:48 pm
., d/b/a Allied Mechanical (31-CA-26605, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 117) Ontario, CA May 31, 2007. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:27 pm
D.C District Court Judge Reggie B. [read post]