Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5641 - 5660
of 21,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
This was because the curved shape towards the inside of the sign from both ends of the black element differ from the ordinary representation of the letter ‘v’ and thus made it closer to the representation of a heart.Novartis v EUIPO concerned situations in which the trade mark applied for was either a three-dimensional mark consisting of the appearance of the designated goods, or a figurative mark consisting of a two-dimensional representation… [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:16 pm
United States [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
United States, could narrow the window for action on qui tam cases. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
Specifically, I explained what had happened in O’Connor et al v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:01 am
Smith, and others; Halbrook on the Court’s decision to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:59 am
United States [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Supreme Court precedent, and with precedent from appellate courts in other states. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
In Madison v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Timbs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:58 pm
Secret of the Islands, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Iancu v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:59 am
The Constitution demands better [Ilya Shapiro on Cato Institute cert amicus brief in Copeland v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:46 am
” Cheney v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
Here, contrary to the defendants’ contention, “in contrast to a private contract dispute, the practices alleged by the plaintiffs were not unique to these parties and involved an extensive marketing scheme that had a broader impact on consumers at large” (De Guaman v American Hope Group, 163 AD3d at 917 [citations and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
First up is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 3:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
