Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 5641 - 5660 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 11:12 am by Mary Whisner
Professor Peter Nicolas  reviews (in the Washington Independent Review of Books) Flagrant Conduct, a new book about the case. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm by David Jacobson
In Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 18 the High Court dismissed the appeal of Peter James Shafron, the company secretary and general counsel of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”), against previous decisions that he contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by failing to discharge his duties as an officer of JHIL with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person in his position would have exercised. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:17 pm by Peter Moulinos
Any questions regarding this action, or similar issues, can be directed to Peter Moulinos at peter@moulinos.com.A Supreme Court judge in Suffolk County has decided that Bank of America should be penalized for its abusive tactics against a homeowner whose property was in foreclosure by reducing in half the amount owed by the homeowner to Bank of America.Judge Arlen Spinner, who as previously issued harsh and newsworthy decisions against banks in foreclosure cases, ruled in Bank of… [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:14 pm by P.J. Blount
Jones and the Future of the Fourth Amendment – PrawfsBlawg Cyberlaw Cybersecurity Awareness and Capacity Building: Some learning objectives – Homeland Security Watch Location Data and Law Enforcement Access – Lawfare Cybersecurity Measure Heads to House Floor Despite Privacy Fears – Threat Level Cybersecurity: Pro and con for wonks – Homeland Security Watch Shared cybersecurity sensibilities squandered in the scuffle – Homeland Security Watch Peter Swire… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:43 pm by Marissa Miller
At Forbes, Peter Reilly examines the consequences of the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Nijmegen, The Netherlands : Published for the Global Law Association by Wolf Legal Publishers, 2011 JZ 5625 A76 2011 V.2 Arms control. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Peter, I’ve done some looking into the question of whether “by or for a member” would support derivative standing to seek dissolution. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation There are no newly adjudicated cases to report but several resolved cases: Peter Reynolds v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A man v Huddersfield Daily Examiner (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Smith on behalf of Gaoh Energy Ltd v Tamworth Herald (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); Mr Patrick McCadden v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 27/04/2012); A woman v North Devon Journal (Clause 1, 3, 27/04/2012); A woman v Western Daily Press… [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:41 pm by Gordon Firemark
Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Crowdfunding after the JOBS Act becomes law Viacom wins appellate round against YouTube Magic Tricks – how to keep ‘em secret Art Collector v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:00 am by Jessica Dorsey
Julian additionally analyzed the ATS in the Supreme Court’s decision in Mohamed v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
McKinnon of the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), and Robert Woods and Peter J. [read post]