Search for: "Reiter v. Reiter"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 6,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2009, 3:28 am
The law in the 8th District goes back to a 1980 case, most recently reiterated in State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:16 pm
See Steiner v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 12:28 pm
The District's response reiterated that "Mr. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:03 am
Sys. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:36 pm
In three previous blog posts, I detailed how Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) violated Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and SEC disclosure rules by improperly deferring the recognition of an accounting error to create a cookie jar reserve to inflate future profits. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:49 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 4:26 pm
" 6 Diamond v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:35 am
In his dissenting opinion, Justice O'Donnell first agrees with the majority and the State ex. rel Ohio Edison Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:58 pm
In PSC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
In US v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:00 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Spicer v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Vaughen v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:33 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published a 2 to 1 opinion in the case of Lee v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 4:24 pm
Archstone Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:53 pm
Insurers should welcome the Oregon Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Dewsnup v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:10 am
For a complete copy of the recent decision Leff v Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:40 pm
See Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:54 am
(3) Data retention remains doubtful in terms of fundamental rights compliance: in the ECHR, S & Marper v UK questions mass monitoring of the unconvicted, Copland v UK reiterates that traffic data is covered by Article 8 (as I argue here); the German courts are considering various challenges (summarised by Digital Rights Ireland: 1 | 2), and DRI itself is engaged in a challenge to the Directive. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:07 pm
(3) Data retention remains doubtful in terms of fundamental rights compliance: in the ECHR, S & Marper v UK questions mass monitoring of the unconvicted, Copland v UK reiterates that traffic data is covered by Article 8 (as I argue here); the German courts are considering various challenges (summarised by Digital Rights Ireland: 1 | 2), and DRI itself is engaged in a challenge to the Directive. [read post]