Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 5641 - 5660 of 85,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 8:48 pm by Mark Murakami
  They argued: First, they contend that EPA erred in failing to provide notice and an opportunity for comment on the final [Vessel General Permit], which contained the state certification conditions. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
• The judgment also ignores the views expressed by Lord Hoffman in Callery v Gray [2002] UKHL 28 as to whether a CFA could be retrospective under the current rules and also the policy issues that were argued in that case. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by webmaster
  The hearing also covered rest break issues implicated by Brinkley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
Suing on behalf of a few taxpayers, Alliance Defense Fund argued that the memorandum violated various state policies, improperly sought to advance one of the governor's political goals, and was inconsistent with a position that the Department had recently taken in another case, Funderburke v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:32 am by Austen Parrish
  Not only are extraterritorial laws inherently undemocratic (regulating foreigners, with no say in domestic political processes), but they also can retard and interfere with the creation of meaningful harmonized international, state-to-state agreements. [read post]