Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
Such an approach would, however, mean that liability, and ultimately the scope of the copyright holders’ rights, would depend on the very divergent solutions adopted under the different national legal systems. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:20 am
Maloney v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:18 am
He is also hearing rumours that Golden Eye's demands somewhat closely resemble those which received judicial criticism from Judge Birss QC (as he then was) in Media CAT v Adams. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:43 am
There is guidance from the government on the nature of the consultation and the courts have been clear (in R(Peat & Others) v Hyndburn BC) that a licensing consultation must follow that guidance. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:57 am
This is permitted under state law. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:24 am
The claim at issue in Indianapolis Motor Speedway, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm
It is not often that the GWOT affects the world of T&E law, but the Supreme Court’s June 21 6-3 opinion in Holder v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:02 pm
Counsel for the condemned in three state’s have asked Attorney General Holder not to release the federal supply of execution drugs. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Citing Scott v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:43 am
There is guidance from the government on the nature of the consultation and the courts have been clear (in R(Peat & Others) v Hyndburn BC) that a licensing consultation must follow that guidance. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm
Holder. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:27 am
Discussing the significance of the US ruling in Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp at the beginning of this month it reads, in relevant part: "Patents relevant to the use of a standard may be unenforceable if the patent holder withheld information during the standards development process, the Appeals Court in the United States (the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) concluded recently.The case related to the H.264 Standard for video compression developed jointly… [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:24 am
The claim at issue in Indianapolis Motor Speedway, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
The case is Alberto Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:57 am
Holder v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 10:39 am
Holder v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:12 pm
Today (Nov 22, 2016), the Supreme Court is considering whether to grant certiorari in Lexmark v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Richman pointed us to a federal statute called the Hyde Amendment, which, according to this 2005 Second Circuit opinion in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am
Although we agree that “the Government’s interest in combating terrorism is an urgent objective of the highest order,” Holder v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:31 am
That changed on October 26, 2006, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
