Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 5641 - 5660 of 29,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 9:39 am by Rick E. Rayl
   While others disagree, I believe the plan passes constitutional muster at the federal level. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
Claim 1 of EP 705 is in the EPC 2000 form and covers a class of effectors of particular enzymatic activity for use in lowering the blood glucose level of mammals for the alleviation of diabetes. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:53 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Moreover, it concluded that there was no manifest intent on the part of the Congress to preempt the enactment and enforcement of such a law at the state level. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:18 am by Terry Hart
That decision is Harney v Sony Pictures Television, released January 7th, 2013. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
The intent and purpose of the 1999 Order was set out effectively in R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, Ex Parte Spath Holme Limited which was referred to in the instant case. [read post]