Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 5641 - 5660
of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 11:00 am
Wilking, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Stephen R. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:59 am
For example, as discussed by in a post by one of the premier U.S. corporate law scholars, Professor Stephen Bainbridge, New York State’s pension fund sued Qualcomm earlier this month seeking to inspect books and records detailing the use of company resources for political purposes. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:58 am
., v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:57 am
Stephen M. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
In September 2009, in Warman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:24 pm
In the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 11:22 am
” In reaching its conclusion, the Court primarily addressed its ruling in Tinker v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:30 am
Stephen M. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:23 pm
For reasons stated in the Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:57 am
Stephen M. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
From Denton v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:16 am
This proposed rule follows the 2018 case Digital Realty v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
The loosening of campaign finance regulation began with the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:58 am
Stephen M. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:13 am
See, Beck v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:16 pm
A Nassau County Drug Possession Lawyer said in the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:23 pm
For reasons stated in the Massachusetts case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:44 am
While the court's earlier denial of the plaintiff's motion to preliminarily enjoin Symantec's annual say-on-pay vote (in October 2012) was welcome and important news to public companies and their advisors (especially since the same court had previously granted a shareholder's motion to preliminarily enjoin an equity plan approval vote in Stephen Knee v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
An important case, especially for family law practitioners to read, is Jennings v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm
Criminal defendants in New York enjoy co-existing state and federal constitutional rights to confront their accusers. [read post]
