Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 5641 - 5660 of 19,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
  The bench consisted of Lord Justice Kitchin (now Lord Kitchin since his elevation last month to the Supreme Court), Lord Justice Floyd and Lady Justice Asplin. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 7:29 pm
Herring (Circuit docket 03-1821) is developing as a sequel to the Justices’ 5-4 ruling in 2007 in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In an opinion for a four-Justice majority by Justice Mary Jane Theis, the Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:11 am by SHG
The best reason I can come up with is that under the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:20 am by Dennis Crouch
” In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Gorsuch, the Supreme Court has affirmed the Federal Circuit’s decision invalidating Amgen’s functionally claimed genus of monoclonal antibodies. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Much is poured into the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
Author: Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of LawThe Conscientious Justice: How Supreme Court Justices' Personalities Influence the Law, the High Court, and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press). [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court granted certiorari in Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 3:53 pm
[Note: For the first part of this post, see this link.]In the second case argued to the Texas Supreme Court last Tuesday (Masterson, et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:14 am by Gene Quinn
While the Supreme Court has done away with the "useful, concrete and tangible result" test from State Street Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, which asks whether the court should reconsider a precedent that requires property owners to exhaust state remedies before bringing federal takings claims under the Constitution, “because the justices were deadlocked and need Justice Kavanaugh—who had not yet been confirmed when [the] case was argued—to break the tie,” or “that the Court is still deciding upon the best theory for overturning… [read post]