Search for: "Victory v. State" Results 5641 - 5660 of 6,924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Ilya Somin
Hardwick helped set the stage for Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 7:50 am by Guest Contributor
EPA adopted these rules after the Supreme Court, in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Bedessee Imports Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Although this qualification applies equally to media and non-media actors, the chief purpose of the qualification is to provide Member States with a mechanism for preventing the modern mass media from abusing its power. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
" Judge Bramlette stated that the requested fees were excessive given the fact that this was a “run-of-the-mill state law case. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am by Kevin Goldberg
”  I can assure you, however, that I would have foreseen the June 19, 2017 decision in favor of The Slants in Matal v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  And in that regard, there ultimately may be a victory for the opponents of the law; business and agricultural interests in Arizona (and similar States that have adopted similar laws) have realized that clamping down on immigrants is bad for business, and the political will to enforce the law in a discriminatory manner may well have dissipated. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Max Kennerly
But it’s certainly not a “huge victory” for the plaintiffs, or for consumers in general. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm by Ilya Somin
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]