Search for: "A L A S" Results 5661 - 5680 of 96,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 6:48 am by Unreported Opinions
In 2021, appellant filed a civil complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City against the Office of the State’s Attorney and Traci L. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:56 am by Patrick Quirk
General Assembly committee to condemn China’s human rights abuses in Xinjiang in October 2022, only four were hybrid regimes. [read post]
The trial found inadequate the mitigation measure designed to address the  project’s adverse wind impacts, but the trial court rejected all of Alliance’s other arguments. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Yet others deal directly with section 3’s literal wording respecting voting rights or eligibility to run for office. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:11 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Andemariam, Legal consequences of Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s unprecedented declaration attributing the instigation of the Eritrea-Ethiopia border war to Ethiopia’s previous ruling party Jasmin Johurun Nessa, Seyfullah Hasar & Agata Kleczkowska, Digest of state practice: 1 July – 31 December 2022       [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:11 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Catzeflis gives an example of signs, which exploit Switzerland’s reputation, as contrary to public order. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am by David Post
(See here, here, here, here, . . . ) In the Nat'l Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
No. 12-3289, 2014 WL 997532, at *3 (Jan. 6, 2014) (noting that the Local Patent Rules, inter alia, require that a party “‘promptly mov[e] to amend when new evidence is revealed in discovery’”) (quoting O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. [read post]
No. 12-3289, 2014 WL 997532, at *3 (Jan. 6, 2014) (noting that the Local Patent Rules, inter alia, require that a party “‘promptly mov[e] to amend when new evidence is revealed in discovery’”) (quoting O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. [read post]
No. 12-3289, 2014 WL 997532, at *3 (Jan. 6, 2014) (noting that the Local Patent Rules, inter alia, require that a party “‘promptly mov[e] to amend when new evidence is revealed in discovery’”) (quoting O2 Micro Int’l Ltd. v. [read post]