Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5661 - 5680
of 95,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
While property owners have a general duty under the common law to treat all persons legally on their premises with reasonable care, the court noted that this duty does not necessarily extend to protecting those who come upon the landowner or business operator’s property from criminal actions taken by third parties. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:40 am
As all know, there is an inherent conflict between the attorney, the insured and the insurer. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:08 am
Judge Gibbons's opinion begins, "The disposition of all of the plaintiffs' claims depends upon the single fact that the plaintiffs have failed to provide evidence that they are personally subject to the [Terrorist Surveillance Program]. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:15 pm
The lawsuit seeks to hold the government accountable once and for all for the exorbitant processing times taking place for work permit applications to be adjudicated, especially those at the California Service Center. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:30 am
Federal courts of appeals have disagreed on whether a named plaintiff in a proposed class action can sue defendants who have not injured that plaintiff but allegedly have injured putative class members. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:52 am
" It is way too easy for plaintiffs to file all sorts of documents ostensibly in opposition to a motion – we’ve seen this all the time in our own cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm
” The court noted that the proposed Class and Subclass likely would include plaintiffs from all 50 states as well as some foreign countries, and that the plaintiffs “propose no solution to allow the court to manage the variety of laws that may be applicable to the Class, other than to suggest that the court certify two subclasses under California and Illinois law. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:57 pm
In issuing her ruling denying the plaintiff’s motion to compel and granting the defendant’s motion for protective order, Judge Zwart stated: “Plaintiff’s demand for all of the defendant’s computer data is consistent with the position of its expert, but it is not consistent with the balancing required under Rule 26(b)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:55 am
Even assuming, arguendo, that the claim was properly pleaded, plaintiff has failed to establish that he would have prevailed in the underlying action but for the defendants’ malpractice (see U Joan Sung v Park, 181 AD3d454 [! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
(See, plaintiffs complaint.) [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Plaintiffs defined the class as consisting of all citizens and/or residents and/or property owners' whose injuries occurred within LeFlore County, OK. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:19 pm
Plaintiff sued for copyright infringement. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:29 am
The defendant moved to dismiss the plaintiff's hostile environment claim, in a motion for summary judgment, claiming that not all of the acts could be considered "discrimination," since they did not reference the plaintiffs' race. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
Plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit on October 22, 2007, more than a year later. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Under the Court's Discovery Order, requests for production are not required; parties are expected to produce all relevant documents without formal requests for production. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 9:32 am
I have come across a number of Wills Variation Act claims in which the plaintiff has not named all of the proper parties as defendants in the lawsuit.The proper parties to a Wills Variation Act suit are as set out in Rule 21-6 (2) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules:Parties (2) In a proceeding referred to in subrule (1), (a) the following persons must be parties to the proceeding:(i) the surviving spouse and children of the testator; (ii) all beneficiaries under the… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:22 pm
The Los Angeles car accident attorneys at Sharifi Firm help motor vehicle collision victims and their families seek compensation from all of the parties responsible for causing a collision. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
But due to class-action procedure and the barriers it erects to opting out, they all get to be plaintiffs in the resulting suit, and the lawyers (self-) appointed to bring the case are expecting to pocket 37 percent, or $15 million, of the $40 million changing hands, a sum that could amount to $1,400 an hour. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:38 pm
The plaintiff argued that the statute of limitations is the same as the underlying wages.The court of appeal agreed with the employer. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:33 pm
The damage award was apparently all to fund a huge life care plan for severely brain damaged 19-year-old plaintiff. [read post]
