Search for: "BlogĀ  Editorial" Results 5661 - 5680 of 5,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm by Eric Goldman
It is also consistent with the exercise of service providers’ own First Amendment rights to distribute and curate content, and to cultivate the editorial policies that best serve their sites and their communities. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The ultra-conservative editorial page of The Wall Street Journal invoked Stalin in attacking the book. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:53 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
    The results are complex, and an accompanying editorial argues that the sample size of 731 rendered the study insufficiently powered to draw conclusions about the comparative efficacy of surgery and watchful waiting. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” It is one thing for a paid advocate in a public-relations campaign to engage in such misleading nonsense, but it is quite another when the editorial board of The New York Times casually says virtually the same thing: “Fewer than 1 percent of the state’s teachers were rated ineffective in the most recent evaluations, while only about a third of the state’s students in grades 3 through 8 were proficient in math and language arts. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
An Editorial Advisory Board Member of the Institute of Human Resources (IHR/HR.com), Employee Benefit News, and other publications, Ms. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:29 pm by Richard Hornsby
Baez’s editorial comments except to say that what he expects of Casey Anthony’s case is precisely what he argues against – special treatment. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
He met with Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes from the UKSC Blog Editorial Team to look back on his time on the bench and consider how the law has changed during his career. [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 9:12 am
Los riesgos del neoconstitucionalismo (y sus antídotos)Ahora bien: en este momento, mientras escribo esto (live blogging), el Dr. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Winning public confidence in IPSO’s independence and effectiveness remains an uphill task, according to its latest external review. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:23 am by gA
Ese fue el primer año de este blog, y le dedicamos un extenso post el día siguiente, en lo que tal vez pudo haber sido el primer comentario no periodístico al fallo.Resumimos acá: es una sentencia que sale con siete votos a favor de nulificar las leyes que obstruían el enjuiciamiento del terrorismo de Estado. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 8:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Just as an aside on that DRP program, indigency program, the Fair Defense Project where you work, and my blog Grits for Breakfast actually teamed up on a two year long campaign to get those rules implemented. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
.* Comments, censorship and editorial balanceAs readers know, this blog does not refuse to post comments with which the IPKat and Merpel disagree. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
To cite a few examples well-known to readers of this blog: Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 5:23 pm
State media ran editorials about resuming international flights to China.But on Thursday the case numbers shot up. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  Bloggers are not only being sued for damages, but also being charged with criminal offences.[4] The question of adequate legislation for blogging and internet use is not limited to defamation law, but as this is a discussion on defamation law reform I shall simply note that the issue of liability for internet blogs is part of a much larger problem. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Jay Baris
REGULATION FD Beginning in 1999 and continuing into 2000, media reports about selective disclosure of material nonpublic information by issuers raised concerns that select market professionals who were privy to this information profited at the expense of others. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
  The Court noted public employees’ First Amendment right, in certain circumstances, to speak as . . . citizen[s] addressing matters of public concern,” and observed that “editorial control over speech and speakers on [the public employee’s] properties or platforms” is “part and parcel” of that right. [read post]