Search for: "C. R. C." Results 5661 - 5680 of 58,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2012, 3:58 am
Here's the abstract:La saisine de la Cour internationale de justice par les États n’est pas uniquement une marque de leur confiance dans le droit international, c’est aussi une expression de leur reconnaissance de son efficacité dans le processus de règlement des différends qui lui sont soumis. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:14 pm by Gabriel Aranda Zamacona
. → Artículos relacionados: Cálculo de pensión Ley IMSS de 1973 -Aproximado- Régimen IMSS 1973 ¿Se suspende mi pensión por reingresar a trabajar en el ROSS del #IMSS? [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : D.V. c. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 1:50 pm
The following is an example of an affidavit that should meet the requirements of the new Rule 902(10)(c): AFFIDAVIT OF CUSTODIAN OF MEDICAL/BILLING RECORDS HEALTHCARE PROVIDER: ____________________ PATIENT: ______________________ BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared ____________________________ (NAME OF AFFIANT), who, being by me duly sworn, deposed as follows: My name is __________________________ (NAME OF AFFIANT). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R v Adams (Northern Ireland), heard 19 November 2019. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am by Sander van Rijnswou
(See Reasons, point 2.2.3.)As a consequence of the foregoing, any infringement of requirements going beyond the principle mentioned in the portion of the catchword 1 of R 8/15 quoted above is not subject to scrutiny by the Enlarged Board in review proceedings under Article 112a(2)(c) EPC. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 5:23 am
Hace unos días publiqué en Fallos DIPr una sentencia dictada por la sala II de la Cámara Civil y Comercial Federal en los autos Armada Holland BV Schiedam Denmark c. [read post]
On 24 September 2019 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave two judgments (Cases C-507/17 and C-136/17) ruling that: (i) de-referencing by Google should be limited to EU Member States’ versions of its search engine with some important qualifications; and (ii) when Google receives a request for de-referencing relating to a link to a web page on which sensitive data are published, a balance must be sought between the fundamental rights of the person requesting… [read post]