Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 5661 - 5680 of 16,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court will examine the meaning of the words “any of the reasons contained in [a notice] relates to a matter which identifies a person” in Financial Services Markets Act 2000, ss 393(1) and (4). [read post]
  While the ALJ again applied Boeing Category 1(b) balancing test, the Board held that this rule, rather, was properly analyzed as a Category 1(a) rule – meaning it is lawful if, when reasonably interpreted, it does not prohibit or interfere with the exercise of NLRA rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 12:10 pm by Giles Peaker
Suffice it to say at this juncture that the law is settled in this area: the Supreme Court having reconsidered the requirement that all tenancies must be for a term certain, and giving the rule renewed (if, it must be said, grudging) approval in Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford(2012) 1 AC 955. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:15 am by openlaws
EU Project openlaws is an EU project which is co-financed by the European Union. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bankrupt Sapphire Glass Supplier Reveals New Details Of Its Disturbing Relationship With Apple http://t.co/A28LdHO9Gp -> Taylor Swift and the Myth of the Mean Greedy Artist | Electric Literature http://t.co/6lzISXcAoF -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-07: Taylor Swift left Spotify because we stopped valuing… http://t.co/fapyeGOA6G -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-11-07 http://t.co/pENaPSQRQZ -> Computer and Internet… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:15 am by openlaws
EU Project openlaws is an EU project which is co-financed by the European Union. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:30 pm
The district court found that "means to resolve" in [claim 1 of] the '159 patent invoked 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
In his famous, and often-cited, concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
  The Board also adopted the judge's finding that the Respondent violated Section 8(b)(1)(A) by making Lopez apprehensive that it was seeking his discharge by means of a Nov. 1, 2006 letter. [read post]