Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 5661 - 5680 of 26,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 12:44 am by Tessa Shepperson
So landlords – don’t count on being able to progress your eviction claim against your anti-social tenant in a month’s time. [read post]
15 May 2020, 12:44 am by Tessa Shepperson
So landlords – don’t count on being able to progress your eviction claim against your anti-social tenant in a month’s time. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:20 pm by Disability Lawyers Dell & Schaefer
It’s a vicious cycle in which the claimant can be, in total, three to four years down the road and receiving no benefits. [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:09 pm by Gregory Dell
This can substantially bolster a policyholder’s disability claim, but only if it’s documented in a proper way that actually benefits the claimant. [read post]
Deadlines Affected Plans must disregard the Outbreak Period when calculating deadlines related to the following elections: the 30-day or 60-day period (as applicable) for an individual to request a HIPAA special enrollment; the date for claimants to file benefit claims and appeals under the plan’s claims and appeal procedures; the date for claimants to file a request for external review after receipt of an adverse benefit determination; the date within which a… [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
Sainsbury’s – 18 months) which was not sufficient to carry out the necessary analysis to support the claimants proposed methodology. [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Appropriate safeguards have to be put in place to protect both the legitimate interests of defendants and those of the members of the claimant group. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
He says it would not be fair to judge the Claimant in this case when there is data not in its possession. 15:20: Lord Sales asks if it would not be the end of the road as Mr Harris QC has said as the class could proceed in the categories in which it meets the CAT standards for data for a claim. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:12 am by Léon Dijkman
That is somewhat surprising: this requirement seeks to prevent "fishing expeditions", i.e. vague and broad disclosure requests that are intended to turn up useful evidence of which the claimant was not aware beforehand. [read post]
12 May 2020, 10:47 am by vforberger
And, by processing, I mean simply scanning the documents into the Department’s computer system and associating those scanned documents with the correct claimant and employer. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:53 am by CMS
This will be of interest to claimants and defendants alike, as well as litigation funders. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
This is somewhat unusual since the driver of the case clearly appears to be the Defendant’s alleged infringement of the Claimants privacy. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:58 pm by Giles Peaker
That purpose is of its nature blanket in character and does not allow for distinctions between cases where the stay may operate more or less harshly on (typically) the claimant. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:03 pm by Siyabonga Mathe
In Zamani Marketing and Management Consultants v HCI Invest 15 Holdco, the claimant instituted proceedings in terms of the Arbitration Act 1965 to review and set aside an arbitration award made by three arbitrators. [read post]
• The Lodestar method requires attorney testimony as to reasonable hours multiplied by reasonable rates, whether tried to a jury or the bench.(9) • “[T]he fact finder’s starting point for calculating an attorney’s fee award is determining the reasonable hours worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, and the fee claimant bears the burden of providing sufficient evidence on both counts. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:28 am by Bob Kraft
It’s stressful not to know exactly what to do or how to do what you need to do following an accident. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considers whether a claimant, during a serious psychotic episode, committed a criminal offence, which she would not have committed but for the defendant’s negligence, can recover damages for the consequences of having committed the offence, including her subsequent loss of liberty. [read post]