Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 5661 - 5680 of 29,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 8:18 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Sept. 10, 2015) to observe that “[i]f that were the expectation, then stock photo agencies and photographers likely would spend more money monitoring their licenses than they receive from issuing licenses. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:00 am by Monica M. Ruiz, David Forscey
As an investigative agency, its role in prevention and helping others defend themselves is limited to threat sharing and recommendations on cyber hygiene. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
Robert Mueller is testifying before Congress on Wednesday, and members will no doubt ask him repeatedly for his views and findings about President Trump. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:19 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Section 230 immunizes defendants from liability if: defendant is a provider or user of an interactive computer service;the information for which plaintiff seeks to hold defendant liable is information provided by another information content provider; and plaintiff’s claim seeks to hold defendant liable as the publisher or speaker of that information.In this case, there was no dispute Facebook met the first two elements, i.e., it is a provider of an… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Annabi, 771 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1985), while other circuits, including the Fourth, construe ambiguity against the government, see United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Central to this finding was that they did not sell or disclose any confidential medial information, [151] I generally agree with the Defendants’ arguments. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 5:20 am
There is, rather, a potential for conflict between their respective interests, and this case illustrates it well: the employer’s option to defend by claiming that its employee acted outside the scope of his employment is an option to defend the employer by sacrificing the employee. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:15 am by SHG
§ 2703(d); see also In re United States for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d), 36 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Gnosis S.p.A., 760 F.3d 247, 262 (2d Cir. 2014), but that was a case of obvious direct competition. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 6:10 am by Eric Goldman
For example, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have technology to proactively identify infringing material, and that Plaintiff has repeatedly notified Defendants of infringing material, but that Defendants nonetheless failed to remove the infringing material. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 3:39 am
In those cases, if a patent is valid and infringed, an injunction is appropriate if a defendant refuses to take a national licence.Other times, a global licence is (F)RAND. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Jareb Gleckel and Sherry F. Colb
To avoid confusion, we therefore refer to the President and the cabinet members sued here collectively as “Defendants. [read post]