Search for: "Gaines v. State"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
With a single application at the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in Alicante, Spain, a registrant can gain protection in its designs for a period of 25 years in all 25 E.U. states. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
Her recent vote in Department of State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
From Stubbs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is Mr. 2 001.240 State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Each defendant named in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Each defendant named in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:33 pm
In each instance the government coercion created a motive for the declarant to fabricate a story in order to gain some perceived benefit. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Harrow v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
During last month’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:33 pm
HECK, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:13 pm
(with Leonard Riskin, James Westbrook, Chris Guthrie, Richard Reuben and Jennifer Robbennolt). – AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:09 am
Source: United States Of America V. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 8:01 pm
For as long as this pattern persists, unless Democrats gain 67 seats in the Senate, no constitutional amendment will succeed in the Senate. [read post]
