Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 76,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2018, 4:37 am
With respect to the allegations of professional malpractice, although the defendants [*2]made a prima facie showing that they did not deviate from good and accepted standards of physical therapy practice, through the submission of deposition testimony, medical records, and the affidavit of a licensed physical therapist (see Shank v Mehling, 84 AD3d 776, 777-778 [2011]), the affidavit of a licensed physical therapist submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition was sufficient to… [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
I don't doubt that they can do it-- professional politicians are very good at rhetorical dancing. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 7:49 am
Case citation: Adrienne Sepaniak King and Christopher Edward Sepaniak King v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:21 am
Some people hold a position for good reasons, some for bad. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 4:59 am
The IPKat has just received an innocent question from his friend Kristof Neefs (Altius): did the normally-vigilant Kat miss Case C-62/08 UDV North America v Brandtraders NV, an Order of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 19 February. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:55 pm
Here is the abstract: In Lands Council v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 8:26 pm
” State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 1:46 pm
So the Ninth Circuit spanks them, and imposes a fee and cost award, plus another $500 to the Ninth Circuit for good measure.By contrast, four of the other attorneys on the case "allowed their names to be placed on briefs that presented frivolous and inflammatory arguments. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:45 am
This was the question addressed by the Supreme Court of Montana in Jacobsen v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm
And gets to serve his sentence out of state.It's good to be the one who flips. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:01 pm
Here's something that's good to know. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:08 pm
For a good example of how you can win the battle but lose the war, check out today's opinion by the Ninth Circuit.The district court held that the City of Prescott, Arizona, had unconstitutionally impaired its contract with Pure Wafer, Inc. when it passed a certain environmental regulation. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:54 pm
Especially since it contains only two (not very good) jokes in it.But the final product is nonetheless outstanding. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:23 am
It is ironic when attorney errors harm an otherwise good legal malpractice case. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm
The Supreme Court issued a summary decision today in a Confrontation Clause case, Hardy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 8:40 am
US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 1:48 pm
" Crossman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 3:44 pm
This past week the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Michigan v. [read post]
