Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 5661 - 5680 of 30,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed StarkIs a company’s post-breach forensic report subject to discovery in subsequent breach related litigation? [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:43 am
Abekasis does not return to the topic of prejudice in his reply brief, which is a concession. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Not only does she catalogue these things. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
How does the rhetoric of past presidents in similar circumstances compare? [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am by Giles Peaker
About two months later (within the 56 day period), Islington sent a letter headed RE: Notification of Decision – Part VII of the Housing Act 1996, which set out Islington’s reasons for finding that Mr M was not in priority need and which concluded: “13. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
The new annual representation, FAR 52.204-26, requires an offeror to represent whether it does or does not “provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm by David Oscar Markus
  It's interesting to re-read the case and to listen to oral argument (which you can do here).The case, per Justice White, held: Under the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may use deadly force to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect only if the officer has a good-faith belief that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.Here, a state police officer shot and killed Garner as he was fleeing the scene of the crime. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
These observations are based on the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]