Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 7,333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Ashcroft v. [read post]
Opinion analysis: Justices throw out most claims against federal officials in post-September 11 case
19 Jun 2017, 6:03 pm
” Justice Breyer dissents in Ziglar v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
P. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
Federal Election Commission, struck down such contribution limits, explicitly relying on the Citizens United decision and on Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion which states that “ingratiation and access . . . are not corruption. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Freund turned down Kennedy’s request to serve as solicitor general, citing his work on the Devise. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Hicks, and Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment and Justice Souter's dissent in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law cases is outstanding: Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:34 am
On Friday, the Justices said they would accept Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
Milligan and in Haaland v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 8:01 am
Justice Kennedy made the following argument in State Farm v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
" The new order did not state what changes had come about since the denial in April. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 8:27 am
In Carr v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:11 pm
In the case of McCutcheon v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am
The other decision was State v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Despite “the difficulty & awkwardness of operating by force on the collective will of a State,” armed federal intervention in state affairs must be permitted.[4]During the Convention, on three different occasions, Madison tried to grant the federal government this absolute “negative” (what we now call a veto) over all state legislation. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, December 6, the Court heard argument in a case – Martel v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 2:38 pm
Bollinger and Gratz v. [read post]
