Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 5,885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
Mark Pocan (D-Madison). [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:57 am
Edited by John C. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 11:15 pm
I thought Barack’s speech tonight was good. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:05 am
Mark Sanford cut class the day the foregoing civics lesson was taught. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 7:07 pm
" (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:28 am
The evidence supported the conclusion that TVT lacked rights in the stylized version of Pitbull's mark. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:02 am
The first solution is self-regulation, [33] which relies on the ADR provider themselves or the third-party evaluation companies using trust marks. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:32 pm
In reaching its conclusion, the District Court held that under the Lanham Act, the federal trademark statute, a trademark owner has a right and duty to control the quality of goods sold under the mark: Because the owner of the trademark has an interest in the party to whom the trademark is assigned so that it can maintain the good will, quality, and value of its products and thereby its trademark, trademark rights are personal to the assignee and not freely assignable to… [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 3:06 am
I simply can't overstate how fortunate we are today and how pleased I am that Conor has brought such good content to On the Mark. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
Thorne, RECLAMATION UNDER THE NEW §546(C)(1): ILLUSORY REMEDY AS EVER, 26-JUN Am. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
c. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:53 pm
"[13] In response of the argument that the board will not take into account the interest of the other constituencies under the shareholder access rule, they argued that reduced accountability to shareholders would not translate into increase attention to stakeholders because the interests of directors are less aligned with the interests of shareholders.[14] Moreover, they argued that special interest groups will not play the central role in the nomination of directors under the proposal access… [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
C. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:03 am
But then, you probably never heard of C. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 7:05 pm
§ 1117(c)(1), an award of $100,000 in damages is appropriate. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 12:22 am
The Code defines a franchise agreement as: ... an agreement: (a) that takes the form, in whole or part, of any of the following: (i) a written agreement; (ii) an oral agreement; (iii) an implied agreement; and (b) in which a person (the franchisor) grants to another person (the franchisee) the right to carry on the business of offering, supplying or distributing goods or services in Australia under a system or marketing plan substantially determined, controlled or… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
Further, the applicant may not reinsert the omitted goods/services.TMEP § § 1201.02(c) and 1201.03(c): Clarifies that an application may be amended to correct the applicant's name if the party listed as the applicant did not exist as a matter of law on the application filing date, and the application was filed by the party who owned or was entitled to use the mark, albeit under an incorrect name or with an incorrect entity… [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:32 pm
C. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:20 am
Tomorrow, October 17, 2007, marks the second anniversary of the effective date of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, known as BAPCPA. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:35 pm
Your tenant representative should be able to give you a good idea if the quoted CAM charges are too high. [read post]
