Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5661 - 5680 of 21,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN>  Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1994, in State v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 5:08 pm by Mary Whisner
Paper proposals were due April 15. 2019 marks the 20th anniversary of Olmstead v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Skykick - why does it matter & what could it mean for trade marks? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Nabiha Syed
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, Dineen failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Tantleff v Kestenbaum & Mark, 131 AD3d 955). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Expect a long, complex opinion.Then on Thursday 25 January we have two treats: * judgment in Case C-48/05 Adam Opel AG v Autec AG, Deutscher Verband der Spielwaren-Industrie e.V. in a reference from Germany for a preliminary ruling on the following questions:"Does the use of a trade mark registered also for 'toys' constitute use as a trade mark for the purposes of Article 5(1)(a) of the Trade Mark Directive if the manufacturer of a toy model car… [read post]