Search for: "PAGE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 9,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
These requirements are similar to those prescribed in the United States by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794d, as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-220), August 7, 1998). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 8:14 am
At page 1009, LaForest J. explained: LaForest J. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:48 am
Garman v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 7:02 am
The Sixth Circuit's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
See Smith v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 1:10 am
Widely unnoticed by the public, a fight between Apple and Samsung in two venues -- the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- over the proper way forward for their first U.S. federal litigation is ecalating. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held that in order for a public official to prevail in such a suit, it was not enough to show that the statement in question contained some inaccuracies. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
So, at the same time the New York Times editorial page promotes a FISA-like court for targeted lethal force, it derides the FISA court as a “rubber stamp” because it almost never rejects an application.[8] How long before a “drone court” operating in secret is criticized in the same way? [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:58 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
The United States has a "federated system," said Hall, with four main biometric databases that after 9/11 all began to share data directly or indirectly. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:27 am
Reversed and remanded in part.Case Name: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
Clarence Earl Gideon March 18, 1963, was the date on which the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a petitioner who was also a Florida convict. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:44 am
The 78-page complaint (full text) in Newdow v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm
” In other words, the Constitution is not meant to read like the 200,000 pages of the United States Code—detailing the contours of each right described therein. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 8:24 am
Kendall v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 12:55 am
Motorola ruling is highly influential, Judge James Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington -- with support from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit -- has become the pioneer and thought leader in the U.S. with respect to the adjudication of FRAND licensing terms by federal courts through the substantive and procedural decisions has has already made in the Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
But none of those would apply here, at least not under the assumption that the blog host and blog contributors are all located in the United States. [read post]
