Search for: "People v High" Results 5661 - 5680 of 15,046
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2017, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Indeed, the high court explicitly rejected the notion that every minor inaccuracy reported in violation of FCRA will cause a concrete harm, giving the example of an incorrectly reported zip code. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am by Mitra Sharafi
I tend to find students have little awareness of things from the sweet spot of recent history between when high school history ends & they were born so even just showing news clips can be helpful. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am by Rachel Zani, CMS
In addition, given the Court’s conclusions that the fees imposed by the Fees Order were in practice unaffordable for some people and that they were so high as in practice to prevent even those who could afford them from pursuing claims for small sums and non-monetary claims, the Fees Order was declared unlawful on the grounds that it contravenes EU law guarantees of an effective remedy before a tribunal, because it imposes disproportionate limitations on the enforcement of EU… [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
I think another piece of this that might be important to think about too, though, is that we don't want people entering pleas without the necessary lab testing.Scott Henson: That's right. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
It is, as the High Court quite properly found, about people seeking to [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 4:32 am by Geoffrey R. Stone and Eugene Volokh
Laws that prohibit people from criticizing a war, opposing abortion, or advocating high taxes are examples of unconstitutional content-based restrictions. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am by Nicandro Iannacci
(“You, the people of the United States, will not permit it to destroy you,” he said of the utility lobby in a public address. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You’re throwing out information, but if you do it right/high enough, you can throw out only information that humans didn’t care about. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fed courts have many costs v. a modest process that is a slap on the wrist—but should also make it easier for © owners to find out who these people are. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 7:41 am by Joy Waltemath
The court explained that the legislature could rationally distinguish between favoring people who use marijuana for medicinal purposes under the careful guidance of a physician from those who use it on a whim to get high. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:43 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
What made me smile this week I’ve joined the Man v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
High capital costs to make one film from a book. [read post]