Search for: "People v Word" Results 5661 - 5680 of 17,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by Holly
Based on people’s reactions so far, the responses are uncannily realistic. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 7:43 am by Eugene Volokh
From Justice Robyn Brody's majority opinion yesterday in Planned Parenthood Great Northwest v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indeed, he barely used the word “privacy” during the oral argument for this case. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
--Judicial SUPREMACY: One has to obey Supreme Court Precedent (inferior courts certainly burt maybe also everyone else (Cooper v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
In other words, we have never seriously questioned that the processes of writing words down on paper, painting a picture, and playing an instrument are purely expressive activities entitled to full First Amendment protection. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
  |  The 17th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure.Never too late 18 [week ending Sunday 2 November] -- The Limerick Competition results | More on CJEU in BestWater | The GC in Laguiole | France to review its IP Code | Reports on the “no patents round-up for non-techie people” event | Renting an orphan work in the UK | Aldi and look-alikes | The UK Supreme Court in Servier v Apotex | Are patent trolls really a… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Unusual spellings can help recall; names that remind people of other words like Verizon/horizon, Intel/intelligent, Viagra/vigor, vitality, aggression, Niagara. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
Viewed in that context, any thought a consumer might have that the words “Havana Club” indicate the geographic origin of the rum must certainly be dispelled by the plain and explicit statements of geographic origin on the label, according to the court.Survey EvidenceThe trial court properly disregarded the survey evidence as immaterial, because the Lanham Act does not forbid language that reasonable people would have to acknowledge is not false or misleading, the court… [read post]