Search for: "People v. Downs"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 16,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Cushman saw tweets that made specific references to parts of the school, C-wing and D-wing, and specific people. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 10:21 am
As I mentioned earlier this week, the big showdown in the US Supreme Court was Tuesday’s oral argument in FCC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Silicon Valley v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:01 pm
James School v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:05 am
Look at the three structural amendments that have made it--the Eleventh Amendment (1795, two years after Chisholm v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:53 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
These will be handed down in Court 1 from 9.45am. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Virginia, Skinner v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Belmont --Notes and Questions --Baker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:09 pm
Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
These flaws likely will not be evident to reporters from the trial record (which is another reason to be cautious when covering trials up front), but typically will arise in appellate arguments down the line.Failing to disclose exculpatory evidence: Brady v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am
By invoking a later Lochner-era case, Eisner v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
These will be handed down in Court 2 from 9.45am. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
MARBURY V. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Mrs Smith pointed out that, even if a trade mark was more than simply descriptive and in principle could be registered, it would not actually be eligible for registration if the mark failed to designate the origin of the product.The best club cardIn assessing whether a trade mark is distinctive and hence does not come within s.3(1)(b), the two-step process laid down by the CJEU in Case C-363/99 Koninklijke KPN Nederland NV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Postkantoor) was adopted by the… [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:27 am
See Hoffa v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:38 pm
Supreme Court unanimously held in Gideon v. [read post]
