Search for: "SCOTUSblog" Results 5661 - 5680 of 16,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 3:38 am by SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court Should Rid Him of that Delusion (Kate Shaw, The New York Times) The post The morning read for Wednesday, December 20 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Supreme Court Rules for Cheerleader Who Posted Vulgar Snapchat Message (Mark Walsh, Education Week) What A Profane Cheerleader’s Case Could Mean For Jan. 6 Insurrectionists (Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Talking Points Memo) The post The morning read for Thursday, June 24 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:39 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Monday morning read: Tribes’ Victory in Oklahoma at Risk in Bold Request to the Supreme Court (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court’s Originalist Evasions (Liza Batkin, The New York Review) Vaccine Mandate Survives High Court Test (Kenneth Jost, Jost on Justice) A Taney descendant joins the effort to rename Philly’s Taney Street (Sarah Gantz, The Philadelphia Inquirer)   The post The morning read for Monday, Aug. 16 appeared first on… [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:31 am by James Romoser
Wade (Mary Ziegler, The New York Times) Jimcy McGirt, whose Supreme Court case reshaped Oklahoma courts, sentenced to three life terms (Chris Casteel, The Oklahoman) Supreme Court ‘shadow docket’ casts pall on environmentalists (Pamela King, E&E News) Text Statistics for 2021 Granted Cert Petitions (Adam Feldman, The Juris Lab) The post The morning read for Thursday, Aug. 26 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by James Romoser
Dorf, Verdict) The post The morning read for Wednesday, Feb. 16 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:17 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: At the Supreme Court, Ethics Questions Over a Spouse’s Business Ties (Steve Eder, The New York Times) The Sotomayor and Kagan retirement question (Aaron Blake, The Washington Post) How the Supreme Court Protects Police Officers (Joanna Schwartz, The Atlantic) The Supreme Court takes up Section 230 (Tom Wheeler, Brookings) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Wasn’t Always Like John Roberts (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate) The post The morning read for… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
I would like to thank Tom and the rest of the SCOTUSblog team for inviting me to become a full-time contributor to this blog. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:44 am by First Mondays
The post OT2017 #29: “Average Joe” appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:11 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
SCOTUSBlog reminds us of some upcoming criminal law cases in the coming term. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:13 am by James Romoser
Douglas, an Early Activist of the Environmental Movement (Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal) The post The morning read for Wednesday, Sept. 7 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:51 am by SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court elections case, politicians could win either way (Andrew Chung, Reuters) House hearing airs ethics allegations against Supreme Court (Josh Gerstein, POLITICO) The New Supreme Court Oral Argument Dynamic (Will Baude, The Volokh Conspiracy) Tech critics urge Supreme Court to narrow Section 230 (Cristiano Lima, The Washington Post) The post The morning read for Friday, Dec. 9 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:54 am by SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court asks for gov’t views on blockbuster Apple/Caltech patent dispute (Blake Brittain, Reuters) Supreme Court Case Could Change How Special Ed Disputes Are Handled (Michelle Diament, Disability Scoop) The post The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 18 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:37 am by Ellena Erskine
(Clayton Henkel, NC Newsline) US government agrees to help restore sacred Native American site destroyed for Oregon road project (Claire Rush, The Associated Press) It’s Not Personal: Why Clarence Thomas’ Trip to the Koch Summit Undermines His Ethics Defense (Justin Elliott, Joshua Kaplan, & Alex Mierjeski, ProPublica) Son of Justice Antonin Scalia to Argue in Supreme Court Debut (Lydia Wheeler, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court Could Eviscerate Rent Control (Matt Ford, The New… [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 8:01 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Youth Group Asks Supreme Court to Revive a Landmark Climate Lawsuit (Karen Zraick, The New York Times) Indigenous group takes fight against Rio Tinto Arizona copper mine to US Supreme Court (Ernest Scheyder, Reuters) No sleeping bags, keep moving: California cities increase crackdown on homeless encampments (Marisa Kendall, Cal Matters)  The impact of the Supreme Court’s reversal of affirmative action, explained in one chart (Nicole Narea, Vox) The… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Bromwich, The New York Times) The post The morning read for Wednesday, June 8 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 7:42 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: The ‘shadow docket’ further erodes the Supreme Court’s legitimacy (Steve Vladeck, CNN) Term limits—a way to tackle the Supreme Court’s crisis of legitimacy (Norman Eisen & Sasha Matsuki, Brookings) It Is Time for the Supreme Court to Act: A Four Step Proposal to Strengthen the Court’s Legitimacy (Barry Winograd, Verdict) Social Media Transparency Rules, Zauderer Standard Head to Supreme Court (Corbin Barthold, Lawfare)… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:55 am by Andrew Hamm
The post Event announcements appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by SCOTUSblog
Court Rules (Glenn Thrush, The New York Times) 5 Ways the Supreme Court Could Roll Back Rights and Damage Democracy (Sam Hananel, Center for American Progress) The post The morning read for Wednesday, June 7 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 7:06 am by James Romoser
The post Thursday round-up appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:02 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
Supreme Court has barred class arbitration of a price-fixing claim in an opinion that scolded an arbitration panel for proceeding as if it had common-law authority.The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-3 opinion that class arbitration may not be imposed on parties who did not agree to it in their arbitration contracts, SCOTUSblog reports. [read post]