Search for: "STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA! "
Results 5661 - 5680
of 9,313
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2013, 7:19 am
This question was asked recently in the March 2013 California case, Quigley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:19 am
This question was asked recently in the March 2013 California case, Quigley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:19 am
This question was asked recently in the March 2013 California case, Quigley v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:19 am
This question was asked recently in the March 2013 California case, Quigley v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 2:47 am
So today, as we honor a man who risked everything to stand up for what he believed in, let us reflect on our common cause and recommit to moving forward together -- as one Nation and one people. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:34 am
The $600 million part of the verdict that stands is what Apple has already won (unless the appeals court overrules Judge Koh) -- and the vacated amount of $450 million can theoretically be lost in its entirety (rather unlikely), may be lost in part (far more likely), or it could also be replaced with a greater amount.In some ways the March 1 damages order ups the ante for Apple. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:13 pm
Our goal is a rule that harmonizes with California's Low Emission Vehicle (LEV III) program finalized in 2012. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
Ditto if space aliens show up and start firing guns that shoot rocks at oncoming traffic. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
The best counterargument (and it came up at oral argument), in favor of sponsor standing, is that if sponsors lack standing to defend initiatives, then elected officials can wrongly “kill” initiatives by simply not defending the measures when the initiatives are challenged. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:48 pm
It meant so much to me to have the support of my family and the ACLU in standing up for what I believe. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:47 am
Furthermore, these individuals neglect to consider the most important factor: However they got there, and they did, the President and Senator Portman’s public statements have opened the door and created a space for people – for both democrats and republicans – to stand up confidently and express their support of LGBT rights in a way like never before. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
I understand that I am a stand-in for former Justice Leah Sears, who had another engagement that popped up and she couldn’t attend tonight. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 5:50 am
Nevertheless, I baked some fresh Lawffice Links to catch up on the latest:Court to Tackle California's Ban on Same Sex Marriage: In Plain English - SCOTUSblog provides a nice summary of the Prop 8 case. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
AmazonDid California Unintentionally (?) [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
The nature of my organization and position within it means that my personal behavior and opinions are very much wrapped up in my professional standing. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:46 am
On California’s ban, 20 states have argued the law should stand, while 13 plus DC and the state of California argue it should not. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:38 pm
They can be purchased as an annual all-inclusive subscription .Modules are available as stand-alone products or in conjunction with other LexisNexis subscriptions. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:09 pm
Therefore, the number of products for which the damages award can stand would go up from 14 to 16, while the number of products for which a new determination is needed would go down from 14 to 12.Apple is right that a joint pretrial conference statement the parties stipulated to in July 2012 contradicts Judge Koh's belief that Apple had based its damages claims with respect to those products on an "aggressive notice date for all of the patents". [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:01 pm
“When this came up, there was a lot of surprise,” he said. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:52 am
Even under the capacious California consumer protection statute, there’s no standing to bring a suit like that. [read post]
