Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 5661 - 5680 of 13,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 2003 U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:20 pm by Lee E. Berlik
” In states like California, mere allegations are not sufficient to defeat an anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
The WHDA US PTO Litigation Alert blog reports on the latest filings of reexamination requests with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and two of them involve hardware patents Apple has previously asserted in court against Samsung, Google's Motorola Mobility, and HTC. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:50 am
A while back, I started following a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The judgment declares that the United States impliedly reserved appurtenant water sources, including groundwater, when it created the Tribe’s reservation in California’s arid Coachella Valley. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
Ct, April 27, 2007) and American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Well, now we know.)This opinion harkens back to the days of Chief Justice Traynor -- viewed by many as one of the greatest legal talents never to sit on the United States Supreme Court -- and is similarly scholarly, progressive, empirical, and informed. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 4:52 pm by Jon Ibanez
Three years later in the case of Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:44 am by Edward Smith
This means that the nearly 2 million undocumented immigrants currently living in California can no longer be discriminated against in civil courts when they are injured or killed. [read post]
11 May 2017, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
***Next week, I'll summarize the Ninth Circuit's important decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
” In doing so, Judge Steeh followed the reasoning of the Northern District of California, who addressed this same issue of Article III standing in connection with Michigan’s VRPA in Deacon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:55 pm by Florian Mueller
On Friday the United States District Court for the District of Delaware held a hearing on InterDigital's motion(s) to dismiss numerous FRAND counterclaims brought by Nokia, Huawei and ZTE in the cases that resulted from mirror complaints to ITC complaints filed in January of this year. [read post]