Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 5661 - 5680 of 41,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 7:28 am by David Lat
Dukes [Supreme Court of the United States] Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:00 am
It’s not often that a Texas tax collection case achieves the status of a published decision by one of the State’s appellate courts, but that’s exactly what happened in Noorani Gas & Convenience, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch Astrazeneca v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by SHG
Under Rule 8(a)(2), a complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” and under Rule 10(b), the pleader “must state [his] claims … in numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by tracey
Supreme Court Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011] UKSC 32 (9 November 2011) Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 (9 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P [2011] EWCA Civ 1257 (09 November 2011) Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GMBH & Ors v Carefusion 303 Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 1288 (08 November 2011) SH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1284 (08… [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:13 am
  In First Bank§1453(b) is to establish that §1441(b), which provides that a home-state defendant can’t remove a diversity suit, does not apply. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
Westfield,  which had seemingly adopted the test for 12(B)(6) motions laid out in the US Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atl. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Under § 1400(b), a domestic corporation "resides" only in its state of incorporation.TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:10 pm
Contents include:Case CommentsJohn Fellas & Pavlos Petrovas, Diag Human SE v Czech Republic-Ministry of Health: A Broad Interpretation of the ‘Arbitration Exception’ of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act  Carlo de Stefano, Adel A Hamadi Al Tamimi v Sultanate of Oman: Attributing to Sovereigns the Conduct of State-Owned Enterprises: Towards Circumvention of the Accountability of States under International Investment Law  Rattapong… [read post]