Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 7,968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an application to… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Texas now joins the vast majority of states that have adopted the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:18 am
Tecnomatic, S.p.A. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:58 am
The Court did reject a provision of PPACA requiring states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their existing Medicaid funding, but the fundamental core of the law was upheld and remains intact. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
That reading of Lopez was rejected by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 7:57 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:51 pm
See Behrend v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:15 am
United States, 536 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:51 am
United States, which involved the question of whether fleeing from the police in a car was a violent felony, and Graham v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Apart from the fact that it is a rather unspecified criteria, issues of macro-economic policy belong to the core responsibilities of the state, but not in the capacity of shareholder, and they do not belong to the core responsibilities of a director or supervisory director, unless and insofar as that policy has been further specified in legislation and regulations. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
The Court failed to extend the at-will exemption to Sullivan, stating that regulatory compliance was not at the core of, nor was it the only purpose of, his job. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
(daytondui.com) The Reality of an Ohio DUI Arrest (daytondui.com) Calibration of the Intoxilyzer 8000, O.A.C. 3701-53-04 (daytondui.com) DUI Case Law Update: State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
Just as Miller v. [read post]
