Search for: "State v. Country" Results 5661 - 5680 of 26,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2020, 11:01 pm by Josh Blackman
He will repeal the ban on almost all travel from some Muslim-majority countries, and he will reinstate the program allowing "dreamers," who were brought to the United States illegally as children, to remain in the country, according to people familiar with his plans…. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Enter Agusto Niz-Chavez, a Guatemalan national who fled violence in his home country and arrived in the United States in 2005. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Scaling Commercial Law in Indian Country Texas A&M Law Review, Forthcoming Number of pages: 38 Posted: 21 Sep 2020 Working Paper Series Marc Lane Roark Southern University Law Center McGirt v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
McConnell—one of the top Religion Clauses scholars in the country—was willing to pass along some thoughts on the Fulton oral argument: The Supreme Court heard oral argument Wednesday in Fulton v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 2:41 am by petrocohen
He has held this distinction since the State first issued the certification in 1998,  and is one of only 18 practicing lawyers in New Jersey with this long term standing. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote about the dignity of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am by Katitza Rodriguez
This forces companies to comply with government demands in a country with a poor human rights record. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Ruth Levush
Most people would agree that the Supreme Court is one of the most important government institutions of the United States, due to its power of judicial review rooted in the famous Marbury v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The Court will not want a repeat of the calamitous decision in Bush v. [read post]