Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 5661 - 5680
of 10,086
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=4ERbC7JyCfULeonard Read, “I, Pencil: My Family Tree as told to Leonard E. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:56 pm
Pierre et Marie Currie v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:05 pm
P & B Autobody, 43 F.3d 1546 (U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 12:40 pm
N.J.S.A. 9:6B-4A(e). [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
ASKIN v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
§ 1503.1(b), and it had the opportunity to respond before it issued the ROD. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
At first blush the rules seem relatively straightforward: they specify (at Section 79.4(b)) that “[a]ll nonexempt full-length video programming delivered using Internet protocol must be provided with closed captions if the programming is published or exhibited on television in the United States with captions on or after [certain dates]. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
See alsoFed.R.Civ.P. 56(e). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
B. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
, Texas Monthly, March 2013 Miscellany • Stephen B. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:31 am
Touby cited and distinguished an earlier case—United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:44 pm
The proposal also adds a new Rule 16(b)(3)(v), which permits a scheduling order to “direct that before moving for an order relating to discovery the movant must request a conference with the court. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
Code §§ 2252(a)(2) and 2252A(a)(5)(B)”. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
THE STATE OF WYOMINGDocket Number: S-12-0187URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Natrona County the Honorable Catherine E. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
See, e.g., id.; State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
Thus under §360j(e) the FDA can impose “other conditions” on medical devices by regulation, and such “conditions” can require “appropriate statements” on the labeling of such devices.The FDA has just such a regulation for “restricted devices,” which it defines as a device for which a requirement restricting sale, distribution, or use has been established by a regulation issued under section 520(e) of the act… [read post]
