Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 19,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 5:06 am
Jae Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 10:30 am
USA: Skidmore v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 3:14 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:26 pm
On 30th September 2011 in State of Haryana v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Here is the motion to dismiss in Pro-Football Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:59 am
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
United States and Miss United States of America : The potential loss of good will and customers by plaintiff, and possible damage to its reputation, as a result of defendants’ alleged infringement of plaintiff’s marks is not easily quantifiable or remediable by damages, and supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:38 am
" (emphasis added)); United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Todd Gaziano and Reed Hopper for Town Hall preview United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 6:40 pm
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
As we stated in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Nestlé v Cadbury: on mixing and matching grounds for exclusion under Article 3(1)(e) Trade Marks DirectiveBack again on the KitKat dispute pending before the CJEU (on which see here, here, here, and here), Mark further reflects upon Attorney General Wathelet's opinion on the second question, which is "Where a shape consists of three essential features, one of which results from the nature of the goods themselves… [read post]
31 May 2019, 11:42 am
AmBrit, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Somoza v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
"The Appellate Term, 2nd and 11th Judicial Districts, believed so and in Chavez v. 407 Seventh Ave. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:33 pm
Kugle and Mark M. [read post]
