Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 16,407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2017, 8:18 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:05 am
Perry, Conscience v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm
Some of these changes are relatively minor, while others reflect the changing needs and circumstances of the legal professions in various jurisdictions. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:42 pm
., Et Al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Kim v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 3:39 am
Barclays Capital Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
Background In an effort to protect minority shareholders who may feel they are being compelled to give up their shares without their consent, various states, including in particular, Delaware, have created a remedy for “dissenting shareholders,” allowing them to seek a judicial appraisal of the fair value of their shares. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm
Background In an effort to protect minority shareholders who may feel they are being compelled to give up their shares without their consent, various states, including in particular, Delaware, have created a remedy for “dissenting shareholders,” allowing them to seek a judicial appraisal of the fair value of their shares. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:57 pm
” Snow v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Horton v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm
Beginning with a California Supreme Court decision called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:05 am
See Dawson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
The minority judges in Equustek stated: “A court may decline to grant an injunction on the basis that it would be futile or ineffective in achieving the purpose for which it is sought. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 2:16 pm
Prime riflessioni) Carlos Manuel Díez Soto, Algunas cuestiones a propósito del derecho de participación del autor de una obra de arte original sobre el precio de reventa (droit de suite) (Some questions concerning the artist’s resale right (droit de suite) Dorothy Estrada Tanck, Protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España con arreglo al Derecho Internacional y Europeo de los derechos humanos (Protection of undocumented migrant persons in… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
Reproductive Health Services, which gave greater leeway to the states to restrict abortion, and Rust v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
Oppressive conduct is evaluated in most states under one of three judicially-created formulations: majority conduct that defeats the reasonable expectations of the minority shareholder; breach of the fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority shareholders; and burdensome, harsh, and wrongful conduct constituting a visible departure from the standards of fair dealing majority shareholders owe minority… [read post]
