Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 5661 - 5680 of 7,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm by Sam Murrant
In the courts Reilly & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rev 1) [2012] EWHC 2292 (Admin) High Court rejects challenge to Government’s compulsory work experience scheme on human rights and legality grounds. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
(Here is further analysis from Stephen McAllister.) [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
  Even though it could be done at no cost to the state. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am by SHG
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). [read post]