Search for: "Study v. State" Results 5661 - 5680 of 15,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair and Carter C. Simpson
” In granting the dismissal, the court implicitly declined the plaintiff’s invitation in his briefing to follow an earlier outcome from Byler v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair
” In granting the dismissal, the court implicitly declined the plaintiff’s invitation in his briefing to follow an earlier outcome from Byler v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
The Supreme Court of North Dakota rendered an opinion in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
 This GuestKat has noted with interest comments which suggest that this case opens the way to a doctrine of "file wrapper estoppel" in the UK, but wonders whether the case really goes much further than existing UK case law which has admitted reference to the file in cases of "admissions against interest" - see for example Rohm & Haas v Collag [2002] F.S.R. 28  and  Furr v Truline [1985] F.S.R. 553. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:16 pm by Tara Breslow-Testa, Esq.
Projections by New Jersey United for Marijuana Reform and New Jersey Policy Perspective states a federal study estimating 365,900 people in New Jersey age 21 and over illegally use marijuana on a monthly basis, consuming 2.53 million ounces a year. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
This wrongly states that Impress made the damages award. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am by Howard Knopf
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:55 am by Richard Hunt
Further problems with the health and training of some of the dogs led to a second suspension of the study in 2012. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by Thomas B. Alleman
The agency brushed aside those critiques as well as significant jurisprudence, see, e.g., Thoroughgood v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:29 am by Thomas B. Alleman
The agency brushed aside those critiques as well as significant jurisprudence, see, e.g., Thoroughgood v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am by Eugene Volokh
If a Slovakian college student who is studying in the United States called the Clinton campaign with such information, that would be a crime. [read post]